<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Search Matrix</title>
	<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3</link>
	<description>because the world needs another blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-26</link>
		<author>Joshua Harris</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-26</guid>
					<description>What are the largest vertical seach industries (those industries that naturally benefit themselves to be searched)that have not been established?  

Amazon - books
Extate - homes
indeed - jobs
cars.com - cars
facebook - people
kayak - travel
itunes - music
???

And a bigger question may be who is going to be the one search engine that will pull all of these specialized vertical search sites together.  With an end goal to create one major search engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the largest vertical seach industries (those industries that naturally benefit themselves to be searched)that have not been established?  </p>
<p>Amazon - books<br />
Extate - homes<br />
indeed - jobs<br />
cars.com - cars<br />
facebook - people<br />
kayak - travel<br />
itunes - music<br />
???</p>
<p>And a bigger question may be who is going to be the one search engine that will pull all of these specialized vertical search sites together.  With an end goal to create one major search engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-40</link>
		<author>Robert</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-40</guid>
					<description>After reading many people proclaim that the emergence of the Vertical Search market has been the result of companies search a specific defined list of websites, I have decided to explain why I so firmly disagree with this position of many.

Firstly Vertical Search, as it has recently been named, is not concerned with the list of websites or broadly speakling, the sets of data, that is used as input to the searh engine when answering a search query. A recent example of what has been proclaimed as an innovate and possibly the largest Vertical Search engine is Indeed.com, focusing on the Jobs market. But Indeed.com is no different to Google, Yahoo and any other search engine. We can prove this concept very easily with a quick analysis of processes for which it claims makes it a true operator in the Vertical Search space and then discuss this in conjunction with the actual purpose that Vertical Search was designed to address.

On the contrary to the approach of the traditional search engine to searching the Web, Indeed.com search a defined list of websites that focus only on the recruitment job posting sector. It is this single attribute that people use to push Indeed.com to the front of the Vertical Search space, the fact the engine programmatically excludes, from its search input set, all information sources that do not relate to recruitment job postings. An incredibly simple job, a mere flick of the switch. The problem is that this completely misses the objective that Vertical Search, the theory, strives to address.

For Vertical Search to work the concept of "Context of Information" must be used to deliver truly relevant results, where the search criteria for inclusion in the final result set is determined by both keyword matching and the identification of context. Indeed.com provides, albeit very poorly, a keyword matching capability. What it does not provide, however, is any degree of context. Consequently it cannot be classified as Vertical Search.

Extate on the other hand actually provides methods to specify how the information, supplied in the search box, should be interpreted by the search engine; the ability to ensure context is identified within your query and then used correctly to return the correct results. I applaud the Extate.com team for their progress in this area and their insight in providing context options that are most highly relevant to the Real Estate industry. The most notable example of a context filter in the Extate search engine is in the ability to search for properties with a specific number of bedrooms or those within a specific price range. The latter option being much more fun and interesting to play with.

Now until Indeed.com delivers a platform with the capability to search beyond mere keyword matching, they cannot be included in the category of a Vertical Search engine. The reason, is quite simply, because the only search filter that they provide is keyword matching. Indeed (the verb, not the noun), the firm do make searching for jobs a little easier by amalgamating the most frequented job sites into one, but I do feel there is much hype over a concept that is little more than a keyword matching search engine that just so happens to scrape jobs from other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading many people proclaim that the emergence of the Vertical Search market has been the result of companies search a specific defined list of websites, I have decided to explain why I so firmly disagree with this position of many.</p>
<p>Firstly Vertical Search, as it has recently been named, is not concerned with the list of websites or broadly speakling, the sets of data, that is used as input to the searh engine when answering a search query. A recent example of what has been proclaimed as an innovate and possibly the largest Vertical Search engine is Indeed.com, focusing on the Jobs market. But Indeed.com is no different to Google, Yahoo and any other search engine. We can prove this concept very easily with a quick analysis of processes for which it claims makes it a true operator in the Vertical Search space and then discuss this in conjunction with the actual purpose that Vertical Search was designed to address.</p>
<p>On the contrary to the approach of the traditional search engine to searching the Web, Indeed.com search a defined list of websites that focus only on the recruitment job posting sector. It is this single attribute that people use to push Indeed.com to the front of the Vertical Search space, the fact the engine programmatically excludes, from its search input set, all information sources that do not relate to recruitment job postings. An incredibly simple job, a mere flick of the switch. The problem is that this completely misses the objective that Vertical Search, the theory, strives to address.</p>
<p>For Vertical Search to work the concept of &#8220;Context of Information&#8221; must be used to deliver truly relevant results, where the search criteria for inclusion in the final result set is determined by both keyword matching and the identification of context. Indeed.com provides, albeit very poorly, a keyword matching capability. What it does not provide, however, is any degree of context. Consequently it cannot be classified as Vertical Search.</p>
<p>Extate on the other hand actually provides methods to specify how the information, supplied in the search box, should be interpreted by the search engine; the ability to ensure context is identified within your query and then used correctly to return the correct results. I applaud the Extate.com team for their progress in this area and their insight in providing context options that are most highly relevant to the Real Estate industry. The most notable example of a context filter in the Extate search engine is in the ability to search for properties with a specific number of bedrooms or those within a specific price range. The latter option being much more fun and interesting to play with.</p>
<p>Now until Indeed.com delivers a platform with the capability to search beyond mere keyword matching, they cannot be included in the category of a Vertical Search engine. The reason, is quite simply, because the only search filter that they provide is keyword matching. Indeed (the verb, not the noun), the firm do make searching for jobs a little easier by amalgamating the most frequented job sites into one, but I do feel there is much hype over a concept that is little more than a keyword matching search engine that just so happens to scrape jobs from other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee Bark Realty</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-543</link>
		<author>Dee Bark Realty</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-543</guid>
					<description>Could you please help.  I wouold like to enter my website, but I have no idea where I can find the logical connection to do this.  

Thanks, 

Dee 
Deebark@sbcglobal.net
Wis. USA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please help.  I wouold like to enter my website, but I have no idea where I can find the logical connection to do this.  </p>
<p>Thanks, </p>
<p>Dee<br />
<a href="mailto:Deebark@sbcglobal.net">Deebark@sbcglobal.net</a><br />
Wis. USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee Bark Realty</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-544</link>
		<author>Dee Bark Realty</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-544</guid>
					<description>I think this is a great idea, but where do I begin with entering my website??

Dee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a great idea, but where do I begin with entering my website??</p>
<p>Dee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Young</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-577</link>
		<author>Debra Young</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-577</guid>
					<description>How do I enter my listing on your website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I enter my listing on your website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Eissinger</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-578</link>
		<author>Rick Eissinger</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-578</guid>
					<description>Here's my real estate website info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my real estate website info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prudential Select Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-579</link>
		<author>Prudential Select Real Estate</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-579</guid>
					<description>I think this is a wonderful idea especially with the way the market is here in Michigan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a wonderful idea especially with the way the market is here in Michigan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Rike Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-581</link>
		<author>Linda Rike Real Estate</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-581</guid>
					<description>How do we add our listings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we add our listings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Rike Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-582</link>
		<author>Linda Rike Real Estate</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-582</guid>
					<description>We need direction on adding our listings or linking to our web site, zip codes  28557, 28512, 28516, 28570, 28584 We specialize in waterfront properties, homes, condos, beach houses etc  at the coast of NC, Carteret County www.lindarike.com 
linda@lindarike.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need direction on adding our listings or linking to our web site, zip codes  28557, 28512, 28516, 28570, 28584 We specialize in waterfront properties, homes, condos, beach houses etc  at the coast of NC, Carteret County <a href="http://www.lindarike.com" rel="nofollow">www.lindarike.com</a><br />
<a href="mailto:linda@lindarike.com">linda@lindarike.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob &#38; Bev Allwine</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-583</link>
		<author>Bob &#38; Bev Allwine</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-583</guid>
					<description>How can I as a Realtor add my listings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I as a Realtor add my listings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie brenner</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-587</link>
		<author>charlie brenner</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-587</guid>
					<description>can we add commercial listings ,if so how???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we add commercial listings ,if so how???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie brenner</title>
		<link>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-588</link>
		<author>charlie brenner</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.byteplay.com/blog/archives/3#comment-588</guid>
					<description>any commercial listings???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any commercial listings???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
